Legal Opinion

Julius Bien Co. v. Franklin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

The plaintiff corporation seeks an injunction by judgment to restrain the defendant, its assignee for the benefit of creditors, from selling the right to the use of the name “ Julius Bien ” as a part of the assigned estate. By way of counterclaim the defendant prays that the plaintiff be restrained from using the name in such manner as to interfere with the rights of a purchaser upon the proposed sale, and the actual question is whether this name “ Julius Bien ” has passed as an asset to the defendant'under conditions which render it the subject of sale. It is quite apparent from the evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Von Bremen v. . MacMonniesNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Slater v. . SlaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Hegeman & Co. v. HegemanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1880
  4. De Ruyter v. . St. Peter's ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Bellows v. BellowsNew York Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MeninCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API