Legal Opinion

Upjohn v. Board of Health

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill of injunction. Complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This suit is instituted to restrain the township board of health of the township of "Richland in the county of Kalamazoo from locating a burial place for the dead in the immediate vicinity of the dwelling house of the complainant in the incorporated village of Kichland in said township. The grounds of equitable jurisdiction which are assigned in the bill are, that the use of the proposed site for burial purposes will be detrimental to the health of the people of the village; that it will corrupt the water of their wells and render it unfit for use, and for these reasons become a public…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chatfield v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855
  2. Merrill v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  4. City of Pontiac v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Lacey v. Davis & McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Veldman v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Reed v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Swift & Co. v. Peoples Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  4. Kinnaird v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  5. Tampa Waterworks Co. v. ClineSupreme Court of Florida · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API