Legal Opinion

City of Bristol, VA v. Earley

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided May 16, 2001No. 1:00CV00173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, District Judge.

In this suit by a municipality seeking a declaratory judgment that a Virginia statute is preempted by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, I grant summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and declare the Virginia statute unenforceable under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

I

The plaintiff in this case is the City of Bristol, Virginia, doing business as the Bristol Virginia Utilities Board (“City”). The City filed a complaint against Mark L. Earley, Attorney General of Virginia, and against the Commonwealth of Virginia, requesting a declaratory…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Honors Acad., Inc. v. Tex. Educ. AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. City of Hugo v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Marcus Cable Associates, L.L.C. v. City of BristolDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2002
  4. Illinois Bell Telephone v. VILLAGE OF ITASCA, ILL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  5. Missouri Municipal League v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API