Legal Opinion
Illinois Bell Telephone v. VILLAGE OF ITASCA, ILL.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 25, 2008No. 06 C 2439, 06 C 1919, 06 C 1922, 06 C 2008, 06 C 2436, 06 C 2437, 06 C 2438PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Illinois Bell Telephone Company, now AT & T Illinois (“AT & T”), brought suit against the Villages of Itasca, Carpentersville, Roselle, and North Aurora, and the Cities of Wheaton, Geneva, and Wood Dale, asserting violations of state and federal statutory law and violations of plaintiffs constitutional rights. The claims stem from a number of ordinances and actions taken by the municipalities allegedly depriving plaintiff of its rights to use the public rights-of-way for its telecommunications network. Because plaintiff made…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jucha v. City of North ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Office of Consumer Counsel v. Southern New England Telephone Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- MCC Iowa, LLC v. City of Iowa CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018