Legal Opinion
United States v. Petters
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 24, 2012No. Crim. No. 08-364 (RHK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Crown Bank (“Crown”) has filed three Verified Petitions (Doc. Nos. 503, 505, 506) under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), asserting interests in certain property previously owned by Defendant and forfeited to the United States. The Government now moves to dismiss the Verified Petitions. For the reasons that follow, its Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.1
BACKGROUND
Defendant was charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy in connection with a large Ponzi scheme he orchestrated over…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Antonia Campos, Jose Campos, Milk-O-Mat, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Real Property, Including All Improvements Thereon & Appurtenances TheretoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Conway v. Heyl (In re Heyl)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Andrew LucasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Steve Conway v. Richard HeylCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013