Legal Opinion

Ferraro v. Kozlowski

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 1, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties have executed and filed a written stipulation of the facts that it is admitted would have been proved on a final hearing. The complainant is the owner of a lot of land designated as lot L, in city block 316, on the official assessment map of Jersey City. Lot K immediately joins the complainant's lot and lies to the east thereof, and immediately to the east of lot K lies lot J on the same map, and both K and J are the property of the defendants. The defendants have been granted municipal authority for the construction of a three-story brick building to accommodate five families and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Club House Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  3. McNichol v. TownsendNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  4. Leaver v. GormanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  5. Henderson v. ChampionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Holmquist v. D-V, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  3. Enderle v. Leslie Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API