HACKER v. 3M COMPANY
District Court, N.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS Case No. 3:19md2885 EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Judge M. Casey Rodgers Hacker, 7:20cv131 Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 50. On full consideration, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate where there are no genuine disputes of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Fed.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Blair v. GEICO General InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Tatham v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.