Legal Opinion

Blair v. GEICO General Insurance

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided January 8, 2013No. Civil No. 11-156-GFVTPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.

As a result of an automobile accident, Darlene Blair, the plaintiff, has sued GEI-CO General Insurance Company (“GEI-CO”), her insurance carrier and the defendant in this case, to collect Underinsured Motorist (“UIM”) benefits under her insurance policy. GEICO removed the case to federal court, and here argues that summary judgment is appropriate on two grounds. First, GEICO argues that this case represents the second action arising from the same accident and insurance policy, and because splitting such an action is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McFerrin v. Allstate Property & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
  2. Adams v. FarbotaDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Alexander v. Walgreens.com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2019
  4. Blount v. Stanley Engineering FasteningDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022
  5. Chancellor v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API