Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Heiman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1936No. Appeal, 98PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

James, J.,

On April 6, 1936, the council of the City of Pittsburgh adopted an ordinance providing for the arrest and punishment of any person or persons “who shall engage in soliciting, offering, exchanging, transmitting any slips, memoranda or communication in connection with the gambling scheme known as ‘Playing the numbers’, within the City of Pittsburgh, to the profit or gain of any number player or other person in any wise a party to or connected with the playing of numbers.” Under this ordinance, David Heiman, alias Dave Simon, was convicted before a magistrate of having taken…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byers & Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  2. Haines v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  3. Van Swartow v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  4. Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Commonwealth v. CanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. CanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Zauflik v. Pennsbury School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API