Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Cano
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1957No. Appeals, 26 and 27PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
per Curiam,
Aurelio Cano and Charles Martin, defendants, ivere convicted by a jury and sentenced in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Schuylkill County for violation of the Anthracite Mine Law, Act of June 2, 1891, P. L. 176, as amended, 52 PS §71 et seq. The defendants were arrested on a warrant issued by President Judge Palmer of Schuylkill County on August 1, 1952, as a result of an affidavit filed by an anthracite mine inspector pursuant to Article XVII, §1 of the statute, 52 PS §511, charging them with being negligently guilty of thirteen violations of the statute. There was no…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Commonwealth v. McHaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- United States v. MorelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Commonwealth v. SojournerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.