Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Cano
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 52 and 53PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Bhodes, P. J.,
Aurelio Cano and Charles Martin, defendants, were convicted and sentenced in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Schuylkill County for violation of the Anthracite Mine Law, Act of June 2,1891, P. L. 176, as amended, 52 PS §71 et seq. They have appealed to this Court.
The defendants were arrested on a warrant issued by President Judge Palmer on August 1, 1952, as a result of an affidavit filed by an anthracite mine inspector pursuant to Article XVII, §1 of the Law, 52 PS §511, charging them with being negligently guilty of thirteen violations of the Law. There was no…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Commonwealth v. McHaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- United States v. MorelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Armando A. Miranda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. DonnellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BartellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.