Legal Opinion

Lane v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Orcmge Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Suit by Lane, against the appellees, to recover damages for maintaining a mill-dam, and backing-water upon the lands of the plaintiff.

Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the defendants.

On the trial, the defendants offered, and gave in evidence, in order to establish a right to overflow the plaintiff’s land, the record of certain proceedings upon a writ of ad quod damnum-, had in the same Court, upon the petition of Joseph Roberts and Martin Rigney, under whom the defendants claim.

*60Roberts and Rigney, who owned the mill-site, proceeded, by way of ad quod damnum, to condemn the lands above…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nay v. ByersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Honenstine v. VaughanIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  3. Smith v. OlmsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Sexauer v. Star Milling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API