Lane v. Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Orcmge Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Suit by Lane, against the appellees, to recover damages for maintaining a mill-dam, and backing-water upon the lands of the plaintiff.
Issue, trial, verdict and judgment for the defendants.
On the trial, the defendants offered, and gave in evidence, in order to establish a right to overflow the plaintiff’s land, the record of certain proceedings upon a writ of ad quod damnum-, had in the same Court, upon the petition of Joseph Roberts and Martin Rigney, under whom the defendants claim.
*60Roberts and Rigney, who owned the mill-site, proceeded, by way of ad quod damnum, to condemn the lands above…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nay v. ByersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Honenstine v. VaughanIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
- Smith v. OlmsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lane v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Sexauer v. Star Milling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1910