Legal Opinion

Sexauer v. Star Milling Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1910No. 21,563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Lagrange Circuit Court; James 8. Dodge, Judge. Action by tbe Star Milling Company against Solomon Sexauer and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing appraisers to assess the damages resulting to appellants’ lands from the raising of a mill-dam. The complaint alleged substantially the following facts: That appellee is a corporation organized and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of Indiana, and is the owner of a twenty-two-aere tract of land in Lagrange county, particularly described, with the privilege of erecting a dam three feet high, and the right to use and overflow water on certain lands as a tail-race, all of which is known as the Star mill property, and is…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Town of Rensselaer v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Heick v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Anderson v. Kerns Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Gillespie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cemetery Co. v. Warren School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Westport Stone Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lowe v. Indiana Hydro-Electric Power Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Wakem v. Inhabitants of Van BurenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API