Legal Opinion

Lane v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from the Orange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

This case is now in this court, for the third time. 17 Ind. 58; 22 id. 104. The action is for the wrongful flowage of the water of Lost river over the land of the appellant hy the erection of a mill dam.

The answer of the defendants consists of four paragraphs. 1. The general denial. 2. A proceeding under a writ of ad quod damnum. 3. That the defendants, and those from and *536tinder whom they claim and derive title, for more than twenty years next before the commencement of this action, had adversely and continuously enjoyed and used as their own, under claim of right, the right to flow the water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Lane v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Owens v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Messick v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Metcalf v. HartWyoming Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Campbell v. Indianapolis & Vincennes RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API