Legal Opinion

Ecenbarger v. Lesoine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1981No. 1627PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a final decree in equity. Appellees, Charles W. and Annelisie E. Ecenbarger, sought by their complaint an order enjoining Ross R. Lesoine, Jr., and his mother, Mildred A. Lesoine, from using a certain road, and requiring them to destroy the road, restore the surface, and pay damages. In the answer to the complaint it was admitted that Ross R. Lesoine, Jr., had constructed the road where appellees alleged he had, but it was claimed that he had the authority to do so because a thirty-three foot easement existed along the entire length of the line dividing…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DeliereSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. City Line Open Hearth, Inc. v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Cole v. HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Schwoyer v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. DePIETRO v. TRIANOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Ianotti v. CiccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Motel 6, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Ira Vernon Pfile, A/K/A I. Vernon Pfile and Virginia v. Pfile, A/K/A M. Virginia PfileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Starling v. Lake Meade Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API