Bell v. United States
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
BORAH, District Judge.
For the history of this litigation prior to the suits for restitution now before us, see Pan-American Petroleum Corporation v. United States, D.C., 18 F.Supp. 624; United States v. Pan-American Petroleum Corporation, 304 U.S. 156, 58 S.Ct. 771, 82 L.Ed. 1262. The present proceedings are incidental to and a part of the main suit. The four defendant railroads (hereinafter named) have now filed petitions for restitution to compel plaintiff, the Celotex Corporation, the successor in interest to the Celotex Company and to Colin C. Bell, et al., as receivers of the Celotex…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N. Bebchick and Daniel W. Gottlieb v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc., Intervenor. D.C. Transit System, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.