Legal Opinion · Dissent

Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1946No. S. F. 16988Published

1Dissent

EDMONDS, J., Dissenting.

In my opinion, the Market Street Railway Company is entitled to retain the accumulated fund representing excess fares paid by its patrons. It is said that, because of the provisions of the stay order, the carrier may not successfully maintain a claim of legal ownership of *374the money now in its possession. But by such an order, this court could not confiscate for the public property which the railroad might thereafter lawfully acquire, nor prevent passengers from abandoning to the corporation amounts paid in excess of the reduced rate during the time the order of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Spiller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Trede v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API