Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ausley v. CCL Label (St. Louis), Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2017No. ED 104439Published

1DissentKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

I respectfully dissent with the majority’s holding and would reverse and remand the award to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) with instructions to apply the correct legal standard when making its findings on whether the employee’s absences from the workplace were approved or unapproved. It is undeniable and indeed undisputed that the Commission erroneously interpreted and applied the state statute defining misconduct by requiring “fault” on the part of the employee in connection with unapproved absences from the workplace. The Commission’s continued reliance on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. John Kolar v. First Student Inc., and Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Robinson v. COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORP.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Stahl v. Hank's Cheesecakes, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. In the Matter of JENNA STAFFORD, Claimant/Respondent v. GREAT SOUTHERN BANK, Employer/Appellant, and MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API