Bell v. Feibush
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a) (section 496(a)) makes receiving or buying property “that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft” a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. Section 496, subdivision (c) (section 496(c)) provides that any person “who has been injured by a violation of [section 496(a)] . . . may bring an action for three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney’s fees.” (Italics added.)
A default judgment was entered against Igal J. Feibush for breach of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Switzer v. Wood, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Lacagnina v. Comprehend Sys., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Montalvo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Allure Labs, Inc. v. Aviles (In re Aviles)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2018
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.