Legal Opinion

Bell v. Feibush

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 2013No. G046166PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a) (section 496(a)) makes receiving or buying property “that has been obtained in any manner constituting theft” a criminal offense punishable by imprisonment. Section 496, subdivision (c) (section 496(c)) provides that any person “who has been injured by a violation of [section 496(a)] . . . may bring an action for three times the amount of actual damages, if any, sustained by the plaintiff, costs of suit, and reasonable attorney’s fees.” (Italics added.)

A default judgment was entered against Igal J. Feibush for breach of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Switzer v. Wood, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Lacagnina v. Comprehend Sys., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. Montalvo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Allure Labs, Inc. v. Aviles (In re Aviles)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2018

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API