Legal Opinion

In re Kirby

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On petition for rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

Heretofore a decision was rendered herein disbarring the accused because of his conviction in the United States district court. In re Kirby, 10 S. D. 338, 73 N. W. 92. He now appeals from the clerk’s taxation of costs in favor of the accusers, and petitions for a rehearing. In Kirby v. McCook Co. Cir. Ct. 10 S. D. 197, 72 N. W. 461, this court clearly indicated the practice where a judgment has been rendered for posts and the opposite party claims nope should have been *415awarded. In such cases tbe party aggrieved should move to have the judgment itself modified, and not appeal from the taxation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. DuketWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Vinsant v. VinsantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Kirby v. Circuit CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rivers v. RiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  4. Wallace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API