Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Shinn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1898No. 11278PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original proceedings in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

In an attempted appeal from a judgment of a justice of the peace the railroad company gave an appeal bond which was insufficient in amount. In the district court the company offered to give a new and sufficient bond, but its application .was denied and the appeal dismissed. The company seeks by mandamus to compel the district court to accept the amended bond and to reinstate the appeal. The only substantial objection to the bond was the insufficiency of the amount. The other objections were captious in their nature and not entitled to serious consideration. It was the duty of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Brockman v. BaymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. United States ex rel. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Mahoney v. StavelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  5. Johnson v. SchochSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API