Legal Opinion

Oldfield v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 13906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, J., pro tem.

Petition for prohibition to restrain respondent court from proceeding to try issues claimed by petitioner to have been finally determined in former proceedings.

The present petition arises out of protracted litigation between different parties to acquire possession of certain securities and funds held by the California Bank. A history of that litigation is found in California Bank v. Traeger, 215 Cal. 346 [10 Pac. (2d) 51], which was an action in inter-pleader to have the conflicting claims determined. For an understanding of the present petition a brief review of such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. California Bank v. TraegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Granger v. Superior Court of Nev. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reidy v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Bixby v. HotchkisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Burgermeister Brewing Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Mears v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API