Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1972No. 31PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The trial court after careful review concluded the defendants had failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination against the defendants in the manner in which the trial jury was selected. The evidence, which is without contradiction, apparently refutes any claim of discrimination. The only apparent shadow in the picture is the designation of race on the tax list and the voter registration list from which the jury list was made up. However, when the purpose of the designation is understood, even the shadow is dissipated.

It is a matter of history and within the realm…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Davis v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Whitus v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. JarretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API