Legal Opinion

State v. Agren

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 29, 1983No. 6027-2-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether it is the County or State which must pay a successful nonindigent criminal defendant's costs incurred on appeal. We hold the County and not the State is liable and therefore affirm the trial court.

This court reversed Patrick Agren's criminal conviction originating from Clallam County in State v. Agren, 28 Wn. App. 1, 622 P.2d 388 (1980) and determined that Agren, who was represented by private counsel, was the prevailing party. Costs were taxed against "the respondent State of Washington" for certain items allowed by RAP 14.3. The County and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thurston County v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Thurston County v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State ex rel. News Publishing Co. v. MilliganWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. DurhamWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. RutledgeWashington Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whatcom County v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  4. Thurston Cnty. Ex Rel. Snaza v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Davison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API