State v. Rutledge
Washington Supreme Court
Exceptions on the part of the state to the taxation of costs against it upon the reversal in the supreme court of a judgment of conviction in a criminal action.
1Per curiam
The appellant was convicted of crime, and appealed to this court, when the judgment entered against him was reversed. In perfecting his appeal, he paid the following fees and costs: T'o clerk supreme court, docket fee, $5.00; to clerk superior court, transcript, $5.00; to clerk superior court, certificate, $.25; to printing brief, $24.75; to stenographer, transcribing statement of facts, $60.90. On the entry of the judgment of reversal in this court, the clerk allowed the appellant judgment for the amount so paid, taxing the same against the state. The state excepted to the allowance of any…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. KeeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Pierce County v. MagnusonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- State v. AgrenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- King County v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.