Legal Opinion

Fincham v. Fincham

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 12, 1946No. 36,404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks a provision in the mandate in this case (160 Kan. 683, 165 P. 2d 209), previously spread of record in the district court authorizing that court to make an equitable division of property between the parties in the event the court deems such a division proper. That the trial court had such statutory power in the original trial by virtue of G. S. 1935, 60-1506, was clearly and deliberately clarified in the opinion.

The essential part of our former mandate reads:

“. . . the judgment of the District Court denying plaintiff a divorce be affirmed, and that the judgment for separate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fincham v. FinchamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. West v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. Irrigation Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Feess v. Mechanics' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Hamilton v. TalbotSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. RhodesAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Eaton v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Fincham v. FinchamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Eaton v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API