Legal Opinion
State v. Viscarra
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1972No. 906PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Defendant was convicted and sentenced for receiving stolen property in excess of $100.00, but less than $2500.00, in violation of § 40A-16-11, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1971). Defendant appeals.
We affirm.
Defendant contends, (1) he was entitled to a directed verdict; (2) the trial court failed to instruct on specific intent.(1) Defendant was not Entitled to a Directed Verdict.
When the state rested, defendant moved for a directed verdict because of the state’s failure to sustain its burden of proof of the essential elements of the crime. The motion was denied and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. ZarafonetisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Brown v. Village of DemingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Westland Corporation v. Commissioner of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Capshaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. ElamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. CastroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973