Legal Opinion

People v. Goggins

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1889No. 20527PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and pleaded guilty to the charge. From the judgment rendered he appeals.

His argument is, that the judgment should be reversed, because the indictment failed to charge him with any crime whatsoever. It alleges, among other things, that the defendant: “Did willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously steal, take, and drive away fifty sheep, the property of Townsend and Carey,” etc.

The defendant claims that it does not appear therefrom that Townsend and Carey were partners in business, or a corporation; that there is no specific…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. SchwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. People v. BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. RibolsiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. EvanoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. People v. GrahleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. State v. FortuneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API