Legal Opinion
Edison Electric Institute v. Henwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 11, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1040-LFOPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs nine-count Second Amended Complaint alleges violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, and the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(c), as well as several pendent state law claims. Defendants argue that the complaint fails to state claims under RICO and Robinson-Patman, and that the remaining state claims should be dismissed under the authority of United Mine…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- W. S. Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A. v. CliffordDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Bridges v. MacLean-Stevens Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) Societe Anon. v. KhalilDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- In Town Hotels Ltd. Partbership v. Marriott Inter., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- PHILIP MORRIS, INCORP. v. Grinnell Lithographic Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.