Legal Opinion
PHILIP MORRIS, INCORP. v. Grinnell Lithographic Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 28, 1999No. 0:95-cv-00733PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
By notice of motion dated January 15, 1999, defendants Grinnell Lithographic Co., Inc. (“Grinnell”) and Oliver Munson (“Munson”), seek the following relief:
1. an order pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:(a) dismissing all claims of Philip Morris, Incorporated (“plaintiff’) for failure to prove that it suffered an injury as a result of defendants’ conduct, or, alternatively;(b) dismissing plaintiffs treble damages claim under Section 2(c) of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(c) (“ § 2(c)”), given the absence of proof of…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- United Magazine Co. v. Murdoch Magazines Distribution, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Sardanis v. Sumitomo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.