Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Blank v. Schafrann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 2, 1987Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part in a memorandum by Levine, J. Levine, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

We respectfully disagree with so much of the majority’s decision which upholds Special Term’s dismissal of plaintiffs complaint as against defendant Jay Schafrann, Michael Platzman, Martin Rosenblum, John McBride and Barry Golomb (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendant attorneys). The instant shareholders’ derivative action is the most recent of a series of actions and proceedings arising out of disputes between plaintiff and his brother,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. McLearn v. Cowen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Strain v. Seven Hills AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Bernstein v. Polo Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Krisel v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API