Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Polo Fashions, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 6, 1976, denying defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the second through fifth causes of action of the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action, or, alternatively for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, in the following respects: (1) the second cause of action is severed until such time as the third cause of action has been tried and if defendants prevail on the third cause of action the second cause of action should be dismissed; (2) the fourth cause of action is dismissed for failure to state a cause…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Shore Bottling Co. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Tenney v. RosenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Miller v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Miller v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Center v. Hampton Affiliates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. EED HOLDINGS v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  3. Lewis v. S. L. & E., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Polyglycoat Corp. v. C. P. C. Distributors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Rubinstein v. CatacosinosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API