Legal Opinion

Fulbright v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 2001No. 2-99-018-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Introduction

Appellant Bennett Fulbright appeals his conviction for driving with a suspended *231license. After a jury trial, his sentence was assessed at 150 days’ confinement and a $100 fine. On appeal, appellant complains the trial court improperly permitted him to represent himself. Appellant asserts the court failed to adequately admonish him of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation, so his waiver of counsel was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntarily. Appellant also contends the trial court abused its discretion by failing to appoint standby…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Buster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  3. Kane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Durham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004
  5. Williams, Janet LorraineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API