Legal Opinion

Durham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided December 29, 2004No. 09-04-175 CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DON BURGESS, Justice.

A jury found Paul Durham guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child and assessed punishment at sixty years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, and assessed a fine of $5000. See Tex. Pen.Code AnN. § 22.021(a) (Vernon Supp. 2005). Durham appeals.

In a sole appellate issue, Durham maintains the trial court committed reversible error by denying his requested “no adverse inference” jury instruction regarding Durham’s failure to testify at the punishment phase of trial. During the guilt/innocence phase, the “no adverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Beathard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delois Brown Clemments v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2013
  2. Durham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API