Williams, Janet Lorraine
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, HERVEY, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
The Court of Appeals held that Janet Lorraine Williams’s waiver of her right to counsel was invalid because the trial judge failed to inquire into her indigent status and admonish her about the right to appointed counsel. 1 The court held that the error was structural constitutional error that is categorically immune to a harm analysis. 2 We granted review to determine whether the court’s refusal to apply a harm analysis was incorrect. We hold that the court was correct and affirm its judgment.
B…
3Cases cited39 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Noel Christopher Huggins v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2021