Bowman v. City of Moorhead
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loking, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant on the pleadings declaring that the revised charter of the city of Moorhead, approved at the election of January 7, 1947, is valid and in full force and effect. The complaint sought to have that charter declared void and of no effect and to enjoin and restrain defendant from issuing certain bonds in excess of the debt limit prescribed by the original charter of defendant.
Defendant adopted a home rule charter in 1900 under Minn. Const, art. 4, § 36. In December 1946, a board of freeholders presented a proposed revision of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Finnegan v. NoerenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Rothkopf v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Village of Spring Lake ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Clemens v. Pinehurst Water DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
- Fox v. Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.