United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The basic question here is whether the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures bars the United States from utilizing certain documentary evidence in this civil antitrust proceeding instituted in the United States District Court of Rhode Island. Subsidiary procedural questions involve the doctrine of res judicata We proceed at once to consideration of the important basic question since for reasons later given we reject the subsidiary res judicata contentions.
First. Whether the Government has a right to utilize the documentary evidence in this civil proceeding can…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by156 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Hiram Ash v. Eugene CvetkovCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.