Legal Opinion

McAdams v. McCord

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2008No. 07-3169PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting the appellees’ motions to dismiss after the district court entered final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). For the reasons discussed below, we find that district court abused its discretion by entering final judgment under Rule 54(b) and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

I. BACKGROUND

UCAP, Inc. (“UCAP”) was a multi-state provider of mortgage lending and brokerage services. In November 2004, UCAP’s subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, although UCAP apparently did not.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Emerson Thomas v. Marian BashamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Lorraine C. Cullen v. Joseph P. Margiotta, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. Janice S. Hope v. Mirek KlabalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Austin Hayden v. Orison F. McDonald Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Clark v. BakaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. OUTDOOR CENTRAL, INC. v. GreatLodge. Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. McAdams v. McCordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Preston v. City of Pleasant HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API