Legal Opinion

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 26, 1993No. 875, Docket 92-6205, 92-6207PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARMAN, Judge:

I. BACKGROUND

Pan Am initiated this suit to recover damages it sustained on January 16, 1984, when an engine on one of its DC-10 aircraft ingested snow and ice while taxiing to its terminal at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) in New York. The ingestion occurred when the aircraft’s pilot applied the engines’ reverse thrust in order to avoid an imminent collision with sand trucks operated by the Port Authority.

The district court conducted a four-day jury trial before granting the Port Authority’s motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a). 787…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Oscar Roldan-Zapata and Pedro Osario-SernaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,766 Paula Fane and Kjell Fane v. Zimmer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Fiorella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Town of SeabrookDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Lane v. Tucson, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  3. Miller v. BontaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
  4. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. The Port Authority Of New York And New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. South Bay Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. BontaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API