Lane v. Tucson, City of
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Justin Lane, No. CV-22-00394-TUC-BGM 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 City of Tucson, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 60.) The 16 motion has been fully briefed. (Docs. 65, 68.) For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ 17 motion is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim 18 against all Defendants survives summary judgment as does Plaintiff’s Fourteenth 19 Amendment property interest claim against the city of…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.