Legal Opinion
Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. Moberly
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 16, 1932No. 2673PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPelphrey, C. J.
On the 27th day of December, 1928, a contract was entered into between the state of Texas, represented by the state highway engineer, and E. Eproson & Co., a firm composed of G. A. Eproson, Ernest Eproson, and R. B. Truett, for the improvement of road bridge No. 19, job No. 108-D., in Henderson county, Tex., according to plans, specifications, proposal, and notice to contractors.
The proposal of the contractors was to do the amount of work itemized in the proposal for $55,527.82, and the contractors executed a bond for that amount with appellant as surety, conditioned that the contractors…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Axtell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Edwards Mfg. Co. v. Southern Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Love v. Austin Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Alamo Iron WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. LaubhanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Southern Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Turner Roofing & Supply Co. v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- O'Connor v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.