Legal Opinion
Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1934No. 6377PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge CRITZ
delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.
This suit was instituted in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, by Mrs. E. L. Moberly against G. A. and Ernest Eproson and Detroit Fidelity & Surety Company. The litigation •grew out of a road construction contract between the State of Texas, acting through the Highway Commission, and E. Eproson & Company, a firm composed of "Ernest and G. A. Eproson and one R. B. Truett. Truett is dead and his estate insolvent. He is therefore not sued. The Fidelity Company is sued as surety on the Eproson & Company bond.
Afte…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
- McDaniel v. National Steam Laundry Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1922
- Hunt v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Temple Trust Co. v. HaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Featherlite Building Products Corp. v. Constructors Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Routon v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Lebo v. DochenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Soper v. MedfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.