Legal Opinion
Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co. v. Southern Surety Co. of New York
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 9, 1933No. 1326PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
In 1930, the San Antonio Independent School District, acting through its board of education, entered into a written contract with the Seidel Plumbing & Heating Company as contractor whereby said contractor agreed to furnish all labor and material and to install certain plumbing in a public school building for an agreed price. The contractor as principal and Southern Surety Company of New York as surety, in compliance with the provisions of Revised Statutes, article 5160, as amended in 1929 (chapter 226, § 1 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 5160]), executed and delivered a bond…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Surety Co. of New York v. Axtell Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. South Texas Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Union Indemnity Co. v. RockwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. WoodwardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Prassel Sash & Door Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Young County Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1933
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. Texas Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Austin Bridge Co. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Capitol Steel & Iron Co. v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.