Legal Opinion
Trout v. Secretary of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 31, 2003No. 01-5325PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
In the most recent chapter of this extremely protracted litigation, the district court, invoking § 114(2) of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (“Act”), Pub.L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071, 1079 (codified as an amendment to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(d)), ordered the U.S. Navy to pay prejudgment interest on backpay and attorneys’ fees for periods before November 21, 1991, to a class of women who successfully established that the Navy discriminated against them in employment on the basis of sex. Trout v. England, No. 73-55 (D.D.C.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. United States Customs & Border Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Coffey v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Haynie v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.