Manley v. Minneapolis Paint Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $1,500 damages for personal injuries. The court, Elliott, J., directed a verdict in favor of defendant; and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action for personal injuries. The trial court, at the close of the evidence, instructed the jury to return a verdict for the’ defendant. The plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The evidence tended to establish the following facts: The plaintiff is a son of the president and general manager of the defendant. • He is a man of at least average capacity and education, and was 2á years old at the time he was injured. He was employed in the paint factory of the defendant as packing and shipping clerk. His duties were to pack goods and check them in and out of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Barg v. BousfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Walsh v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Piechuck v. MagusiakSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Blomberg v. TrupukkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Forquer v. Slater Brick Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.