Tuttle v. McGeeney
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpiegel, J.
These are two actions of tort arising out of a collision of motor vehicles. They were consolidated and tried together. In the first case, Marjorie Tuttle sought to recover for personal injuries and property damage to her automobile. The other action was by William Bowers to recover for personal injuries. A count for consequential damages by the mother of Bowers was waived during the trial. An auditor, to whom the cases were referred, found for the defendant in each case. The cases were subsequently tried to a jury, who returned verdicts for the plaintiffs.
The eases are here on exceptions of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Berardi v. MenicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Donnelly v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Lipchitz v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Squeri v. McCarrickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Cepeda v. KassMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Burns v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.