Legal Opinion

DePaul v. Bleakley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 29, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for professional malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated November 6, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 30, 1998, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, bars the relitigation of issues that have been actually litigated and necessarily decided in a prior action (see, Kaufman v Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Langdon v. WEN Management Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Mahl v. Citibank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. McCue v. AbelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API