Legal Opinion

Mahl v. Citibank, N. A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and misrepresentation, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered April 7, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant Citibank, N. A. (hereinafter Citibank), brought a foreclosure action against the appellants in which the appellants failed to interpose an answer and ultimately defaulted. The appellants then brought this action against Citibank, an officer of Citibank, and Citibank’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fandy Corp. v. Lung-Fong ChenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Hanspal v. Washington Mutual BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Shirley v. DanzigerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Aurora v. Ford Motor Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. DePaul v. BleakleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API