Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Ewing

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1940No. L. A. 16931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

This case came on for trial upon pleadings by which each of the parties charged the other with cruelty. The appellant then filed an amended complaint alleging a cause of action for wilful desertion and the respondent filed an amended cross-complaint upon the same ground. At the time the suit was brought they had been separated less than three months, but more than one year had elapsed between the date of separation and the filing of the amended pleadings. An interlocutory decree granted the respondent upon her cross-complaint is challenged by the appellant upon two grounds. He asserts that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Floberg v. FlobergIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Benkert v. BenkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Kusel v. KuselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hurning v. HurningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cavallo v. CavalloNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Brooks v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Burt v. BurtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Carollo v. CarolloNew York Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API