Orr v. Allen
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.
This appeal concerns'a contract for the sale of real property wherein Frank Orr is the seller and William H. Allen the purchaser. Three questions are presented. First, should the contract be cancelled or rescisson granted as contended by plaintiff? Second, should specific performance be decreed as contended by defendant? Third, are defendants Means and Leach bona fide purchasers for value of the property involved?
The action was commenced by Frank Orr, through his guardian, for the purpose of having the contract cancelled or rescission granted. The defendants denied the right to cancellation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Douglas v. OgleSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- York v. McNuttTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Fewkes v. BorahIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Mach v. BlanchardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Fischer v. GormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonough v. KahleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Heinzman v. HowardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Milligan v. WaldoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Olson v. OppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Walsh v. ShouldersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.